6. Encounters with Deities ![[go to toc]](../../images/scrollup.gif)
Two meetings of Maha Kassapa with deities of lower or higher order
have been recorded. They are related here because they illustrate his
independence of spirit and his determination to keep to his austere
way of living without accepting privileges from wherever they were
offered.
There was a young female deity, called Laja, who remembered that
she had obtained her present celestial happiness because in her
previous human existence as a poor woman, she had offered parched rice
to the Elder Maha Kassapa with a believing heart, uttering the
aspiration: "May I be a partaker of the truth you have
seen!" On her way home, while reflecting on her offering, she was
bitten by a snake and died, and was immediately reborn in the Heaven
of the Thirty-three gods, in the midst of great splendor.
This the deity, remembered, and in her gratitude she wanted now to
serve the great Elder. Descending to earth, she swept the Elder's cell
and filled the water vessels. After she had done that for three days,
the Elder saw her radiant figure in his cell, and after questioning
her, asked her to leave as he did not wish that monks of the future,
knowing of it, should disapprove of him. His entreaties were of no
avail; the deity rose into the air, filled with great sadness. The
Buddha, aware of what had happened, appeared to the deity and consoled
her by speaking of the worth of meritorious deeds and their great
reward. But he also said that it had been Kassapa's duty to practice
restraint (Commentary to Dh. 118).
In the other story it is told that Maha Kassapa, while living at
the Pipphali Cave, had entered a period of seven days' uninterrupted
meditation, spending the time in unbroken meditative posture. At the
end of that period, after arising from that meditation, he went to
Rajagaha on almsround. At that time there arose in five hundred female
deities of Sakka's celestial realm the keen desire to offer almsfood
to the venerable Maha Kassapa. With. the food prepared, they
approached the Elder, asking for his favor by accepting their
offering. But he asked them to leave as he wanted to bestow his favor
on the poor so that they could benefit from their meritorious deed. As
he did not yield to their repeated entreaties, they finally left. When
Sakka, king of the gods, heard about their vain effort, a great desire
arose in him as well to offer almsfood to that great Elder. To avoid
being refused, he turned himself into an old weaver. When Maha Kassapa
approached, he offered rice to him, and at the moment the rice was
accepted it turned exceedingly fragrant. Then Maha Kassapa knew who
this old weaver truly was, and he reproached Sakka: "You have
done a grievous wrong, Kosiya. By doing so, you have deprived poor
people of the chance to acquire merit. Do not do such a thing
again!" "We too need merit, revered Kassapa! We too are
in need of it! But have I acquired merit or not by giving alms to you
through deception?" "You have gained merit, friend. Now
Sakka, while departing, gave voice to the following "Solemn
Utterance" (udana):
"Oh, almsgiving! Highest almsgiving!
Well bestowed on Kassapa!"
Comy. to Dh. 56; see Udana, 3:7
7. Relations to Pupils and Fellow Monks ![[go to toc]](../../images/scrollup.gif)
One so very dedicated to the meditative life as Maha Kassapa was
cannot be expected to have been keen on accepting and training many
pupils; and, in fact, the canonical texts mention only a few pupils of
his.
One of Kassapa's few recorded discourses addressed to the monks
deals with the subject of overestimating one's attainments:
"There may be a monk who declares he has attained to the
highest knowledge, that of Arahatship. Then the Master, or a
disciple capable of knowing the minds of others, examines and
questions him. When they question him, that monk becomes embarrassed
and confused. The questioner now understands that the monk has made
this declaration through overrating himself out of conceit. Then,
considering the reason for it, he sees that this monk has acquired
much knowledge of the Teaching and proficiency in it, which made him
declare his overestimation of himself to be the truth. Penetrating
the mind of that monk, he sees that he is still obstructed by the
five hindrances and has stopped half-way while there is still more
to do."
A.10:86
Apart from the few instances where Maha Kassapa is speaking to
unnamed monks or a group of monks, the texts record only his
relationship to Sariputta and Ananda.
According to the Jatakas, in former lives Sariputta was twice the
son of Kassapa (J.509,515) and twice the brother of Kassapa
(J.326,488); he was once also Kassapa's grandson (J.450) and his
friend (J.525). In his verses, Kassapa tells that he once saw
thousands of Brahma-gods descend from their heaven, pay homage to
Sariputta, and praise him (Thag. 1082-1086).
Two conversations between Maha Kassapa and Sariputta have been
recorded in the Kassapa Samyutta. On both occasions it was at evening
time, after meditation, that the venerable Sariputta went to see the
venerable Maha Kassapa.
In the first text Sariputta asked: "It has been said, friend
Kassapa, that without ardor and without fear of wrongdoing, one is
incapable of gaining enlightenment, incapable of attaining Nibbana,
incapable of attaining highest security, but that with ardor and with
fear of wrong-doing, one is capable of such attainments. Now in how
far is he incapable of such attainments and in how far is he capable
of them?"
"When, friend Sariputta, a monk thinks: 'If bad and unwholesome
states that have so far not arisen in me were to arise, this would
bring me harm,' and if then he does not arouse ardor and fear of
wrongdoing, then he is lacking ardor and fear of wrong doing. When
he thinks: 'If bad and unwholesome states that have arisen now in me
are not abandoned, this would bring me harm,' or: 'If unarisen
wholesome states were not to arise, this would bring me harm,' or:
'If arisen wholesome states were to vanish, this would bring me
harm,' if on these occasions, too, a monk does not arouse ardor and
fear of wrong-doing, then he is lacking these qualities, and lacking
them, he is incapable of attaining enlightenment, incapable of
attaining Nibbana, incapable of attaining the highest security. But
if a monk (on those four occasions for right effort) arouses ardor
and fear of wrong-doing, he is capable of attaining enlightenment,
capable of attaining Nibbana, capable of attaining the highest
security"
S.16:2;condensed
On another occasion Sariputta asked Maha Kassapa some questions
which one may not have expected: whether the Perfect One (Tathagata)
exists after death, or does not exist, or (in some sense) both exists
and does not exist, or neither exists nor does not exist.
In each case Maha Kassapa replies that this was not declared by the
Exalted One. And when asked why not, he said: "Because it is of
no benefit and does not belong to the fundamentals of the holy life,
because it does not lead to turning away (from worldliness), nor to
dispassion, cessation, (inner) peace, direct knowledge, enlightenment,
and Nibbana."
"But what, friend, did the Exalted One declare?"
"This is suffering -_ so, friend, has the Exalted One
declared. This is the origin of suffering the cessation of
suffering the way to the cessation of suffering so, friend,
has the Exalted One declared. And why? Because it conduces to
benefit and belongs to the fundamentals of the holy life, because it
leads to turning away (from worldliness), to dispassion, cessation,
(inner) peace, direct knowledge, enlightenment, and Nibbana"
S. 16:12
We have no tradition as to why Sariputta posed these questions,
which for an arahant should have been fully clear. It is, however, not
impossible that this conversation took place immediately after
Kassapa's ordination and before his attainment of Arahatship, and that
Sariputta wanted to test him in that way; or, perhaps, it was for the
sake of other monks who may have been present.
The Majjhima Nikaya records a sutta (No. 32, Mahagosinga Sutta) in
which Maha Kassapa participated in a group discussion with several
other eminent disciples led by Sariputta. At the time these elders of
the Order were residing in the Gosinga Forest along with the Buddha,
and on a clear moonlit night they approached Sariputta for a
discussion on the Dhamma. Sariputta declared: "Delightful is this
Gosinga Forest, it is a clear moonlit night, the sala-trees are in
full bloom, and it seems as if celestial scents are being wafted
around." Then he asked each distinguished elder in the group
Ananda, Revata, Anuruddha, Maha Kassapa, and Maha Moggallana what
kind of monk could illumine that Gosinga Forest. Maha Kassapa, like
the others, replied according to his own temperament. He declared that
a monk who could illumine the Gosinga Forest would be a
forest-dweller, one who went on almsround, who wore rag-robes, who
possessed only three robes, who had few wishes, was content, aloof,
not gregarious, energetic, and who would speak in praise of each of
these qualities. He would also possess virtue, concentration, wisdom.
deliverance and the knowledge and vision of deliverance, and would
speak in praise of each of these attainments.
According to tradition, Maha Kassapa also had close connections in
former lives with the venerable Ananda. Ananda had twice been his
brother (J. 488,535), once his son (J. 450), once even the murderer of
his son (J. 540), and in this life he was his pupil (Maha Vagga I,
74). The Kassapa Samyutta likewise has two conversations between them.
They concern practical questions, while those with Sariputta referred
to doctrine.
On the first occasion (related at S. 16:10) Ananda asked Kassapa
whether he would go with him to the nunnery. Kassapa, however, refused
and asked Ananda to go alone. But Ananda seemed to be keen that
Kassapa should give a Dhamma talk to the nuns, and he repeated his
request twice. Kassapa finally consented to go and gave a discourse to
the nuns. But the result turned out to be quite different from what
Ananda had expected. One of the nuns, Thullatissa by name, raised her
voice to make a rather offensive remark: "How could the Revered
Kassapa presume to speak Dhamma in the presence of the Revered Ananda,
the learned sage? This is as if a needle peddler wanted to sell a
needle to the needle maker."
Obviously this nun preferred the gentle preaching of Ananda to
Kassapa's stern and sometimes critical approach, which may have
touched on her own weaknesses.
When Kassapa heard the nun's remarks, he asked Ananda: "How is
it, friend Ananda, am I the needle peddler and you the needle maker,
or am I the needle maker and you the needle peddler?"
Ananda replied: "Be indulgent, venerable sir. She is foolish
woman.
"Beware, friend Ananda, or else the Sangha may further examine
you. How is it, friend Ananda, was it you to whom the Exalted One
referred in the presence of the Sangha when saying: 'I, O monks, can
attain at will the four fine-material and immaterial meditative
absorptions, the cessation of perception and feeling, the six
supernormal knowledges; and Ananda, too, can so attain'?"
"Not so, venerable sir."
"Or was it that he said: 'Kassapa, too, can so attain'?"
From the above account we see that the venerable Maha Kassapa did
not think that Ananda's conciliatory reply was adequate, or did full
justice to the situation. Thullatissa's remarks showed her personal
attachment to Ananda, who has always been a favorite with women, and
who had also given his strong support to the founding of the Order of
Nuns (Bhikkhuni Sangha). This emotional relation of Thullatissa's to
Ananda could not be put aside just by Ananda's general remark. Hence
Kassapa responded in a way which, at first glance, appears rather
harsh: "Beware, friend Ananda, or else the Sangha may further
examine you!" This was to say that Ananda should not engage
himself too much in ministering to the nuns, as on their part
attachment such as that of Thullatissa's could grow from it, and cause
others to entertain doubts about him. Kassapa's reply has therefore to
be seen as the earnest advice of a taint-free arahant to one who had
not yet reached that state. When, immediately after, Kassapa mentioned
that the Buddha had declared his own meditative attainments equal with
those of himself, and not Ananda's, this may be taken as pointing to
the far different spiritual status of the two; and it may have served
as a spur to Ananda to strive for those attainments. The nun
Thullatissa, however, left the Order.
Another conversation between the venerable Maha Kassapa and Ananda
arose on the following occasion (related at S.16:11). Once the
venerable Ananda went on a walking tour in the Southern Hills,
together with a large company of monks. This was at a time when thirty
mostly young monks, pupils of the venerable Ananda, had given up the
robe and had returned to the lay life. After the venerable Ananda had
ended his tour, he came to Rajagaha and went to see the venerable Maha
Kassapa. When he had saluted him and had sat down, Kassapa said this:
"What are the reasons, friend Ananda, for the sake of which the
Blessed One had said that only three monks should take their alms
meal among families?"
"There are three reasons, venerable sir: it is for
restraining ill-behaved persons, for the well-being of good monks,
and out of consideration for the lay families."
"Then, friend Ananda, why do you go on tour with those young
new monks whose senses are unrestrained, who are not moderate in
eating, not given to watchfulness? It seems you behave like one
trampling the corn. It seems you destroy the faith of the families.
Your following is breaking up, your new starters are falling away.
This youngster truly does not know his own measure!"
"Gray hairs are now on my head, venerable sir, and still we
cannot escape being called 'youngster' by the venerable Maha Kassapa."
But the venerable Maha Kassapa repeated again the very same words
he had spoken.
This could have ended this matter, as Ananda did not deny that the
reproach was justified. He objected only to the hurtful way in which
Maha Kassapa had expressed his censure. In response to the admonition,
Ananda would have tried to keep his pupils under stricter discipline.
But, again, this matter was complicated by a nun, Thullananda, who
along with Thullatissa was one of the "black sheep" of the
Bhikkhuni Order. She had heard that Ananda had been called a
"youngster" by the venerable Maha Kassapa, and full of
indignation, she voiced her protest saying that Kassapa had no right
to criticize a wise monk like Ananda, as Kassapa had formerly been an
ascetic of another school. In that way, Thullananda diverted the
matter of monastic discipline into personal detraction. Besides, she
was wrong, as our earlier account has shown. (Before meeting the
Buddha, Kassapa had gone forth as an independent ascetic, not as a
follower of another school.) Thullananda soon left the Order, just as
the other wayward nun, Thullatissa, had done.
When the venerable Maha Kassapa heard Thullananda's utterance, he
said to Ananda: "Rash and thoughtless are the words spoken by
Thullananda the nun. Since I left the home life, I have had no other
teacher than the Exalted One, the Holy One, the Perfectly Enlightened
One" (S.16:11).
|
|